[MEDIA=youtube]LJaXUh7IT3U[/MEDIA] Poster of the video claims he is getting roughly 25 fps or so using the moded GMA drivers with HL2 set to the "high" setting. His computers spec is below [quote] Half life 2 on my lappy: 1.8ghz dual core vista sp1 2 giga ram 80 gb hdd gma 950 224 shared vram [/quote] Now as a owner of FRAPS I know that it is a resource hog. So the video he has recorded is taking away from a lot of his machines ability to play the game. So if he is getting 25 fps or so using FRAPs then its probably because of the larger processor capacity and extra gb of ram. Since I wont be using FRAPS while I play HL2 I assume it may be possible to get a decent experience out of HL2. I have a hardcore gamming rig but just want to see if I can get HL2 to run decently for bragging purposes when my "little Netbook that could" is running some thing most labtops cant. With a stock Aspire 150X I want to see if we can get a decent experience by doing the following: Using the Modded GMA 950 drivers. Using modded sound card drives. - This seems to be completely ignored so far, but some of the slowdowns may be reduced by addressing some of the sound issues. Adding the command line parameters mentioned in previous threads. Also, this may seem VERY strange but if you set the game compatibility to Windows NT some times you can get less stuttering because of the way Windows NT compatibility mode handles some of the issues with memory and processes. I used to work as a beta tester for a MMOG that was texture pre-fetch intensive and by accident we discovered by setting the compatibility mode to Windows NT on the lower end machines it made a HUGE difference on the stutters we were experiencing in game. It sounds like rubbish, but it worked so well the devs added to the FAQ, and we backed the data with FPS reports. If its possible to do this may be a key to those who cant run HL2 very well with XP but can using OSX. My aspire hasn't arrived yet but i plan to try this to see what I can get out of the machine.