Decided on a One, but which OS?

Discussion in 'Acer Aspire One' started by andy100, Sep 23, 2008.

  1. andy100

    andy100

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi,

    This is my first post and it's probably in the wrong forum, but after weighing up the pro's & con's of the various netbooks, I'm swaying towards an Acer One (mainly due to the huge HDD as I'd like to use it to store my music library).

    However I'm unsure whether to go for the Linux version at £249 or pay the extra £25 for the XP version @ £275 plus delivery?

    I've always used Windows so am a little uncertain of Linux, but I'm not too worried for day-to-day use as it'll mainly be for surfing and typing the occasional doc, and I've read plenty of user comments from Win guys that the Linpus OS is easy to pick-up. However as mentioned above I want to be able to store my music collection, which is currently sitting on my iPod classic (configured for Windows).

    So how easy is it to transfer this to a Linux OS and will it still be able to sync correctly and everything (I've seen Amarok seems popular) - I don't want to plug my iPod in and lose everything! Though I've never particularly liked iTunes so not using that isn't a major problem for me!

    On a side note, my 15.4" Acer laptop is now broken thanks to a replacement AC lead with a straight adaptor tearing the power socket away from the motherboard (I think!), so does the One come with an L-shaped adaptor?

    Thanks for any advice!

    Andy
     
    andy100, Sep 23, 2008
    #1
  2. andy100

    melhiore

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,503
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bolton, Lancashire, UK
    Take Linux - better stuff. You gonna love it or hate it - in that case always you can change OS but there is a great chance you can learn yourself something new :)
     
    melhiore, Sep 23, 2008
    #2
  3. andy100

    SbM

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2008
    Messages:
    505
    Likes Received:
    0
    Get any of them and install Mac OS X ;)
     
    SbM, Sep 23, 2008
    #3
  4. andy100

    andy100

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'd love to SbM, but maybe I should get used to Linux first! :lol:

    Any advice from anyone on the charger and music questions?

    Cheers,
    Andy
     
    andy100, Sep 23, 2008
    #4
  5. andy100

    kevin

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    274
    Likes Received:
    0
    £25 is good value for Windows, if you like Windows. I have the Linux version, not to save £25, but because I prefer to use Linux.

    You can sync music to an iPod using, e.g., GTKPod, but I think it will struggle with DRM-protected files if you have these.

    If you're familiar with Windows and don't mind carrying on using it, I should stick with it and stump up the small amount of money.

    On the other hand you might think getting to grips with Linux is a useful learning experience. It would be a mistake, in my view, to think that what you know about Windows will carry over into using the Linux version. They are very, very different in just about every way. If you _don't_ want a learning experience, _don't_ buy the Linux one.

    My charger connection is L-shaped, by the way.
     
    kevin, Sep 23, 2008
    #5
  6. andy100

    rbil

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2008
    Messages:
    730
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The Wet Coast, Canada
    Amarok is a killer application when it comes to music. That alone would lead me to suggest that Linux is the way to go. If your collection is large have it stored on a mysql database.

    Cheers.
     
    rbil, Sep 23, 2008
    #6
  7. andy100

    kevin

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    274
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amorak won't sync DRM-protected media with an iPod. So far as I know, nothing else that runs under Linux can do that either.

    That doesn't bother me, because I wouldn't touch anything with DRM with a long pole. But it could be a deal-breaker for people who have spent too much time in the iTunes Store.
     
    kevin, Sep 23, 2008
    #7
  8. andy100

    rbil

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2008
    Messages:
    730
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The Wet Coast, Canada
    People actually pay for digital music? Very strange indeed.

    Cheers.
     
    rbil, Sep 23, 2008
    #8
  9. andy100

    ...BeAkEr...

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    99
    Likes Received:
    0
    gotta go vista

    linux is fun for about a week and then you think why the **** am i using this?
     
    ...BeAkEr..., Sep 23, 2008
    #9
  10. andy100

    kevin

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    274
    Likes Received:
    0
    My gut feeling is that you'd need to put a pile of extra RAM into it for it to run Vista remotely well. Linpus is well matched to a machine that has 8Gb of storage and 512 Mb RAM. With a hard disk and 1.5Gb RAM you're approaching something that stands a chance of Windows XP booting before the universe implodes. But, of course, that's going to cost a bit more, have a shorter battery life, and generally be slower at most things. But 1.5Gb is really rock bottom for Vista.

    Linpus is absolutely fine for Web surfing, word processing, e-mail, all that kind of stuff. It will be about as fast as that kind of hardware is ever going to be, give decent battery life, and be pretty stable. If you want more than that, the choice becomes more difficult. Personally, I wouldn't recommend Linux (Linpus or otherwise) to anybody who wants more than this basic functionality, unless you're willing to put the effort into learning how to make it fly.

    But when it flies, it really flies.
     
    kevin, Sep 23, 2008
    #10
  11. andy100

    andy100

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks for the replies. I don't have that much music at the moment anyway, and about 3 DRM-protected albums, because I never got around to copying my CD collection in the 9 months that I've had my iPod. I am planning on copying several friends music collections though that certainly aren't DRM-protected ;)

    I'm swaying more towards the Linux version now firstly because it's cheaper and secondly because it means if I do want to learn it then it gives a little more scope. I bit of searching around indicates that it shouldn't be too difficult to install XP if I do change my mind!

    Thanks for the answer regarding the power adaptor too!

    Andy
     
    andy100, Sep 23, 2008
    #11
  12. andy100

    Grim Squeaker

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2008
    Messages:
    410
    Likes Received:
    0
    And then you think: "Because it is fun" ;)

    But seriously - let us look at the philosophies of some Operating systems

    Windows -who's your nanny ?
    The user wants something that works for most of his needs and runs on a reasonable variety of modern hardware. The user is not really interested in the inner workings of the system and is already happy if it all just runs. Due to the user not being that interested, one must assume that he sometimes needs to be protected when he wants to do something advanced (e.g. the Vista are you sure you wanna do this" screens).

    Linux (and several other *nixes/BSD) - "What is thy bidding my learned master ?"
    The user wants something that can be customised for almost every situation and almost all hardware. The user is either:
    • willing to read manuals and likes to feel in control of his system - or at least feel that it is theoretically possible to be in control if he wanted to.
      or:[/*:m:38hlm26f]
    • assumed to wish to do only a limited number of predefined things in an efficient way with as little bloat as possible.[/*:m:38hlm26f]
    Apple - Oooh - shiney.
    Things must look pretty. Things must work. The most efficient way to guarantee they work is to control the hardware it is supposed to work on; so no dozens of competing manufacturers here.

    Simply pick the one that appeals most to you. Or use several ;)
     
    Grim Squeaker, Sep 23, 2008
    #12
  13. andy100

    keroro1979

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    I went for the bog standard 8gb hd, 512mb ram, linpus.

    Although I am quite enjoying Linux (first time usingit), it does feel restrictive after the hand-holding experience which is windows.
    Before anyone has a go at me, Im not knocking Linux, just stating how very, very different it is.

    If Id had the choice at the time of buying, I would have gone for the Windows XP one, and Im thinking of changing to XP anyway.

    Actually, thats a point - will it run ok on this bog standard AA1, or will I need more ram for XP? (really not bothered about Vista lol).
     
    keroro1979, Sep 23, 2008
    #13
  14. andy100

    SbM

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2008
    Messages:
    505
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Linpus distribution for the One is very restrictive out of the box, but Linux itself is not. Try installing Ubuntu, for instance.
     
    SbM, Sep 23, 2008
    #14
  15. andy100

    xraycat

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly. You won't like Linpus if you have always used Windows. Try installing VLC (to actually play media files) on Linpus if you've never used Linux before; you'll want to install Windows as soon as you realize that you have to use command line to do it.

    Vista runs EXCELLENT on my 1.5GB One. It actually has more RAM than my desktop and HTPC which both run Vista (1GB RAM in each). The problem with running XP or Vista on the Linpus version of the One is that the SSD is actually the bottleneck for good performance. You'll want to either boot off an external USB hard drive, swap a ZIF drive for the SSD or buy an XP version that has the 120GB or 160GB drive.
     
    xraycat, Sep 23, 2008
    #15
  16. andy100

    andy100

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    D@mn all this choice! I'm now swaying back towards the XP version, even though it's slightly pricier, as I figure I can easily install Linux in future if I need to. :)

    I wish I could afford to buy both and decide with them in front of me! :roll:

    Andy
     
    andy100, Sep 23, 2008
    #16
  17. andy100

    Grim Squeaker

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2008
    Messages:
    410
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not if you ever used DOS ;)
    Your comment however inspired me to open a debate topic on this - so kudos :)
     
    Grim Squeaker, Sep 23, 2008
    #17
  18. andy100

    xraycat

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    If you want to run Windows then you can't really use the SSD, you'll need to replace it or buy a version that comes with a hard drive.
     
    xraycat, Sep 23, 2008
    #18
  19. andy100

    andy100

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sorry, I should've said, I was going to go for the 120Gb HDD version! :)
     
    andy100, Sep 23, 2008
    #19
  20. andy100

    kevin

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    274
    Likes Received:
    0
    Define `excellent'. If you've been running Vista on 1Gb RAM machines, then 1.5Gb probably feels quite roomy.

    I've got nothing against Vista -- I use it on my desktop PC. But I'd be amazingly surprised if Linux wasn't faster and more efficient than Vista on the One. Of course, if you don't know how to get the best out of Linux and don't want to learn, then there's not even a discussion to be had, so far as I can tell. The difference in price certainly wouldn't be enough to perusade me to by a cheaper version if I had to learn a whole new OS to do so.
     
    kevin, Sep 23, 2008
    #20
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.